Monday 19 March 2012

Heaping On the White Guilt

I went to bed last night in a rage, having been told by ABC panellists that my presence in this country is illegal. That my mother, brother, and young daughter were all criminals trespassing on Aboriginal land.

Once again (yeah, it's getting pretty tedious, it's it - we were lecture on the instituitonal racism of this country. The governments of years past had enabled racist, divisive policies such as the White Australia policy, and because of this flawed past racism has remained a disease of the Australian mind.

Germaine Greer, though admitting to being in London 8 months of the year, still thought she knew enough about Australia's current social climate to judge us all as racist remnants of a distant past.

Of course, my anger eased once I told myself that the panellists lecturing me were just a remnant themselves. A remnant of a distant past when Australians were judged as racist idiots. Don't listen to them, I told myself, you're smarter than that.

Tuesday 6 March 2012

The Fine Art and Gentle Science of Medical Murder

In retrospect, reading an essay on after-birth abortion probably wasn't a good way to start the day. Infact it was the worst thing I could have read. While the semantically tip-toed drivel of Drs Albert Giublini and Francesca Minerva didn't contribute to my morose mood this afternoon it certainly did make me want to throw up, even on the packed City bound train. 

In their essay, for the "Journal of Medical Ethics," entitled "Why Should the Baby Live?" Giubilini and Minerva give examples of cases where it should be permissable to perform an after birth abortion. 

Here's dumbass me thinking doctors were supposed to save lives. 

So what "reasons" do Giubilini and Minerva (I will not be referring to them as doctors for the remainder of the article because I feel they have lost the right to that title. I will be doing what I can to influence their deregisteration.) 

Cases in which after birth abortion might be practised:   

1- "A woman whose partner leaves her after she discovers that she is pregnant." 

Say a young lady is 3 days off her due date. Her partner (probably a drug addict scumbag) courageously leaves her and his unborn child. 

The woman gives birth on the due date, but then decides, arbitrarily, that she can't afford to look after the child by herself. 

So a murderer posing as a doctor comes along and slays the child while the mother watches. Cackling maniacally at the same time. 

See, in the Western world we have a thing called social security, and welfare. Single mothers have access to help from the government in providing for their child. The affordability argument has never be more to me than a bad excuse for legalised infanticide. 

But what other examples do the learned quacks give? 

Emotional impact on family members. That includes parents, siblings. 

The murderous twosome argue that the emotional burden on families, the emotional burden on siblings as well, should be taken into account. 

Yeah, it's hard being a kid these days. One minute you're turning 12, the next some cute little poser has just popped out of your Mum and started hogging all the affection. 

I know how devastated I was when my brother and sisters were born. 

If only there was some way that the older siblings didn't have to feel the emotional pain of having a beautiful little baby enter their lives. 

The essay also says that children may be an "unbearable burden on the family and society as a whole." 

There was once a man who thought certain "burdens" on society should be eliminated. He had a funny moustache, wore a brown shirt, and really loved birthday parties at Nuremberg. 

Yeah, THAT guy.   

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you  Giubilini and Minerva, here for all your unwanted disposal needs. 

Throughout the essay the authors refer to newborns as "potential persons." They aren't persons because they are "incapable of looking after there own interests. They are potential persons though. 

Strangely, animals are considered to be persons by the authors. 

So because little bub doesn't have the physical strength to go out and get a job to pay the mortgage, or feed himself, it's okay to kill him. 

That's what you get when the medical world that once used to save lives so eagerly sells it's soul to Satan. 

The authors go on to make more strange assumptions. Such as suggesting that mothers may face more grief and psychological stress giving up their baby for adoption than they would if they aborted it. 

Yes, it can be so stressful knowing that your child is alive and well, being raised by another family, breathing the air, playing at the beach, learning the beauties of life. Why didn't you just kill it when you had the chance. 

Things Giubilini and Minerva think are more important than newborn babies. 

- animals 
- the mother's psychological state  
- the bratty siblings 
- the dead beat father 
- Imagined future society   

But I think the saddest thing is that many of these children are left to die alone on slabs of cold metal. In trays. In bins. No one to hold their hand as they die a lonely death. 

Alright that's enough of this topic. 

Next week something amusing.    


God bless the innocent dead. Your cries shall not be ignored. 

This article is dedicated to the victims of the greatest holocaust of the modern era. May they see Jesus threw the darkness of their final lonely hour.